Over 58388
politifake

Normal Politics


heating and cooling cycles -


TAGS: winter storms normal
Rating: 4.06/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - February 9, 2015, 7:00 am
Google "David Blood and Al Gore"
OTC - February 9, 2015, 6:59 am
I didn't specify Bama's gubmint to climate change.
fauxnews - February 9, 2015, 1:20 am
^_^ You crack me up when you actually pretend to know what you are talking about.
OTC - February 8, 2015, 10:09 pm
No slick, those links weren't evidence of climate change but how the government lies and misleads, but somehow they wouldn't lie or mislead about taxing and regulating using climate change as the cover
fauxnews - February 8, 2015, 5:20 pm
And as much as I loathe government, it can't be used as a proxy for everything wrong in the world, let alone a substitute for a good argument. Pimples...GUVMINT! Kim Kardashian...GUVMINT!! Cut myself shaving this morning...GUVMINT!!! You get the idea. ;-)
fauxnews - February 8, 2015, 5:17 pm
...then you are just spouting more conspiracy theory nonsense. Not to mention your evidence against man-made climate change was an article about Obamacare and Net neutrality. Why not an article about the kitchen sink while you are at it? LMAO
fauxnews - February 8, 2015, 5:15 pm
Hate to break it to you, honey child, but 97% of those scientists we keep speaking of are from all over the world, and don't work for Bama's gubmint. Unless you are suggesting they work for a shadow government, or the illuminati...
fauxnews - February 8, 2015, 5:13 pm
gee...another red-herring.
fauxnews - February 8, 2015, 5:13 pm
*yawn* You listed a biased article from biased conservative advocacy group about government corrupt that has zero, zilch, nada, nothing to do with climate change or science for that matter. For your next act, a picture of someone picking on a kitten? :-p
OTC - February 7, 2015, 9:23 pm
The government would not EVER lie about anything either, they are completely trustworthy. oh wait - http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/11/10/obamacare-architect-yeah-we-lied-to-the-stupid-american-people-n1916605
OTC - February 7, 2015, 9:16 pm
Keep drinking that gubmint cool-aid, because the government would NEVER EVER mislead us about anything. Oh wait - http://www.westernjournalism.com/fcc-commissioner-blasts-obama-hiding-net-neutrality-plan-american-people/
fauxnews - February 7, 2015, 7:51 pm
^_^ You crack me up when you actually pretend to know what you are talking about.
OTC - February 7, 2015, 5:36 pm
Contributing does not mean causing and CO2 by nature far out weighs man's
fauxnews - February 7, 2015, 4:36 pm
Conceding,on any level, that man contributes a 'significant' amount of CO2 means, at least on some level, we are responsible for the part of climate change we cause and we've a responsibility to do our part not to make the problem worse.
fauxnews - February 7, 2015, 4:34 pm
Enough evidence is out there to show, without a shadow of a doubt, that man has pumped a lot CO2 into our atmosphere. You're argument only works if you can prove that man's contributions are truly so such much smaller than that produced by nature.
OTC - February 7, 2015, 12:19 pm
back into nature. There is a relationship between solar activity warming oceans and more CO2.
OTC - February 7, 2015, 12:14 pm
For the third time, that is cranky's a$sertion, I've made a couple posters illustrating that, sorry if it was too subtle. The argument for libs is "man" is heating the planet. man made CO2 is small compred to nature, and the majority of that is absorbed
OTC - February 7, 2015, 12:10 pm
Because when I want to make ice, I put the ice tray in the oven.
fauxnews - February 5, 2015, 9:39 pm
*cue Jeopardy music* X-D
fauxnews - February 5, 2015, 9:38 pm
I can list the posts, if you like, where you claim that you believe that "CO2 causes climate change", albeit you think it makes a difference if it's naturally occurring or not. Fine then: Either CO2 is the cause or it's not. Which one is it?
fauxnews - February 5, 2015, 9:36 pm
*ahem*Speaking of "ambiguous", mind hopping off that fence for once and telling us what"you believe about CO2"then? Al Gore may have changed the name but his position has remained the same.I've seen you change your position several times,back and forth
OTC - February 5, 2015, 9:05 pm
Must be talking about ALarmist Gore who was crying the whole man-made global warming thing before it was changed to climate change, which in itself is ambiguous
premiumgrade - February 5, 2015, 8:54 pm
So true, more extreme weather. The problem with that is the climate has been changing for over 4 billion years.
DebtToAmerica - February 5, 2015, 9:27 am
"discovers global warming - realises too late that he should have called it climate change, because people are too f***ing stupid to understand that global warming means more extreme weather, h**ter summers and colder winters"


EVIL CORPORATIONS - Those who believe corporations are evil and pay no taxes- GE paid little to no tax simply because their finance division took a loss on bad loans. Thank you Fannie, Freddie,Chris and Barney!




It's a cycle stupid -


TAGS: climate change is normal
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - February 4, 2015, 5:28 pm
you're the one believing what cranky said i believe about CO2. I've made posters contradicting that
fauxnews - February 3, 2015, 6:51 pm
proper syntax*RIDING-THE-FENCE
fauxnews - February 3, 2015, 6:50 pm
False information?how about NO information.When you actually provide something tangible,I'll let ya know.In the meanwhile,you're content trying to pass off'riding-the-fence'as a actual argument so that way no one can question you.How childish can you get?
OTC - February 2, 2015, 6:04 pm
So you admit you weren't paying attention and that your rhetoric has faux believing false information
crankyhead - February 1, 2015, 2:10 pm
OK then OTC, now's your chance to explain yourself. Provide the 'true info', or whatever you want to call it.
OTC - February 1, 2015, 7:53 am
Faux, you're believing what cranky said I believe, not what I believe. You see how easy it is to believe false info?
fauxnews - February 1, 2015, 2:44 am
lol...So, OTC, you are saying that natural CO2 is different than man-made CO2? OTC...let me introduce you to my good friend, the 'periodic table.' ROFLCOPTER
crankyhead - January 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
…been able to get him to explain why.
crankyhead - January 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
Moreover, OTC doesn't even deny CO2's involvement as one of the main causes of climate change. What he does deny, however, is that the CO2 the is produced by industry (coal, fossil fuels, etc…) is the same stuff produced by nature. And I've never...
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:54 pm
Zeit, stop confusing facts with opinions
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:53 pm
Sure faux, I've even been to (according to Al Sharpton) Iowa Canada
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:51 pm
Well, since you're gonna answer for Zeit I tell you you're both wrong, I don't deny climate change
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 3:13 pm
Now that's a good boy.
OTC - January 28, 2015, 2:12 pm
Why would I insult Canada? It's a beautiful country
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:41 pm
lol
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:40 pm
So now comes "clown" and "skippy" and the other nervous tics when you get a little unraveled..lol..You're falling apart at the seams, man! Get a grip. P.S. You forgot to insult Canada X-D
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:35 pm
Uh, climatology. duh..lol..And the 97% of climatologists/scientists that disagree with you.Plus, now, apparently, all the Republicans in the Senate who've said, and I quote, global warming is NOT "a hoax." Is that"specific"enough for ya?If so,ACES! X-D
OTC - January 28, 2015, 1:09 pm
Your sentence sounds like you're talking about the science of carbon taxation
OTC - January 28, 2015, 1:04 pm
Deny what science? be specific
Zeitguy - January 28, 2015, 11:55 am
Debating the issue of carbon taxation is one thing, but to deny the science is quite another.
OTC - January 28, 2015, 9:49 am
Great, another clown who thinks he knows me. news flash skippy, if a republican had made it and if republicans were pushing tax and control because if man-made global warming the poster would have 'republicans'
OTC - January 28, 2015, 9:45 am
So tell, what is it I'm denying?
DebtToAmerica - January 28, 2015, 12:25 am
he doesnt believe in scientists, he thinks they're just liberals wearing labcoats. and that dog that barks all night? its a liberal too. and the terrorists? they're definetly liberals. and that obama guy is the biggest liberal of them all!
DebtToAmerica - January 28, 2015, 12:21 am
you'd be cupping the balls and s******ing the bull**** if it was a republican who had made "an inconvinient truth". and i think its hilarious.
OTC - January 27, 2015, 9:23 pm
Scientific community? I didn't know Al Gore and Sheldon Whitehouse were scientists
Zeitguy - January 27, 2015, 7:45 pm
OTC, really? Liberals? Come on man. Stop with the blind labeling to establish your own shortsighted validation. In this case call them the scientific community and yourself the faith driven denier. It's OK, the first step is the hardest.
OTC - January 27, 2015, 2:05 pm
The aim of liberals is to attack when always questioned
Bandit5906 - January 27, 2015, 12:26 pm
The aim of science is to always question!
Zeitguy - January 27, 2015, 7:49 am
Change "liberals" to scientists and stop confusing weather with climate.


Obama pushes climate change hoax agenda -


TAGS: climate change is normal
Rating: 4.6/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - July 7, 2013, 6:01 pm
Comments like- " I know for a fact though, than human beings are pumping trillions of tonnes of the stuff into the atmosphere annually by burning fossil fuels." Comment #54878
OTC - July 7, 2013, 5:49 pm
The conclusion can be made by your comments as to what you believe
StoneTools - July 7, 2013, 3:09 pm
Please explain how CO2 was the cause of global cooling in the seventies and global warming in the 2000s
crankyhead - July 7, 2013, 12:02 pm
...Please explain to us how it's possible that naturally occuring CO2 can warm up the atmosphere, but man made CO2 doesn't? Please explain to us how you keep these two obviously conflicting thoughts in your head at the same time, and believe both.
crankyhead - July 7, 2013, 12:00 pm
How is it that OTC continues to pretend to tell me what I believe, instead of taking the time to try and understand what I believe? I NEVER said that the production of CO2 was the exclusive domain of man. You dimwit. What I said, OTC, was this...
JGalt - July 6, 2013, 12:00 am
in increasing CO2 from a measly 280 ppm to 400 ppm???? WTF Logic Fail. Arguments and fancy discussions about about the greenhouse effect are not going to overcome physical chemistry and thermal conductivity experiments....of a gas at 400 ppm vs 80% N2
JGalt - July 5, 2013, 11:52 pm
In the 70's CO2 rose and the scientists were worried about global cooling and the next ice age. If the thermal conductivity of Nitrogen is nearly twice that of C02, how do liberals justify that the 80% of Nitrogen atmosphere is overcome by global warming
OTC - July 4, 2013, 6:47 pm
For something we have no control over
OTC - July 4, 2013, 6:47 pm
How is it liberals think CO2 only comes from man and only CO2 is causing global warming? Solar activity has nothing at all to with it, nature it self has nothing to do with it, only man. Idiots, global warming is nothing more than a means to tax people
crankyhead - July 4, 2013, 3:19 pm
...begin to even pretend to yourself, that billions of tonnes of man made CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere isn't toying with that cycle? Honestly, please explain to me, how it is you can believe two opposite things at the same time.
crankyhead - July 4, 2013, 3:17 pm
You too OTC. Thanks for telling me what I believe. You guys must be debate team champs or something. Let me ask you something OTC, if you're willing to concede that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are part of the 'warming/cooling' cycle, how can you...
OTC - July 3, 2013, 5:07 pm
One more time, I don't disagree the earth goes through cycles of heating and cooling, I do disagree that man is the cause of the current warming and since that is what you believe, I have to disagree with you.
KaBoom - July 1, 2013, 7:32 pm
..levels were much higher than they are now.The sun's output and the Earth's position correlate to temp changes better than any CO2 graph does.Temps trend up AND down with the same CO2 levels.If Gore was right, that wouldn't be true.
KaBoom - July 1, 2013, 7:28 pm
CO2 does have a greenhouse effect and all things being equal will increase temps.However, the temp is NOT completely dependent and there is no such thing as a "runaway greenhouse effect." There have been numerous ice ages that have happened AFTER CO2..
crankyhead - July 1, 2013, 1:58 pm
Good of you to not disagree with me, OTC. I must be finally getting through to you.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 8:54 pm
crankyhead - May 3, 2013, 5:47 pm, #54770 Increased levels of CO2, is what I said, OTC. You can agree or refute, I'll wait.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 8:43 pm
"who admitted that a rise in CO2 caused the earth to warm up"- cranky. Comment #54770
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:15 pm
That's called cognitive dissonance folks. It's a hallmark of right wing ideology.
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:14 pm
Let's see... who was it that I was talking to, who admitted that a rise in CO2 caused the earth to warm up enough to end an ice age, but somehow wants to not believe that a rise in CO2 is warming up the planet?
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:12 pm
CO2 is, in fact, a greenhouse gas, you idiot.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 1:52 pm
ST, according to that article, it seems liberals think the news media are scientists. 'A rise in CO2 while temperatures are in a lull' , lets see, who was it that argued with me that a rise in CO2 is causing the rise in temperatures?
StoneTools - June 28, 2013, 3:04 pm
http://mrc.org/bias-numbers/networks-do-92-climate-change-stories-fail-mention-lull-warming-all-92-times
OTC - June 28, 2013, 1:57 pm
If we observe it is raining, should we sound the alarm for global flooding?
OTC - June 27, 2013, 12:16 pm
Renza, before stating your opinion, did you research that to see if the opinion was derived from research or did you merely state your opinion without any research?
StoneTools - June 27, 2013, 8:54 am
There's also a difference between stating an opinion and using bogus results from "research" to "prove" your results.
Renza - June 27, 2013, 8:14 am
There's also a difference between stating an opinion and doing research on the topic before stating an opinion.
StoneTools - June 27, 2013, 1:11 am
There's also a difference between saying "there's a tornado coming" and saying "Man caused that tornado to exist"
terroraustralis - June 27, 2013, 12:36 am
they arent predicting climate change, they're observing it. theres a big difference between saying theres a tornado coming, and saying "hey, look over there! a tornado!"


Liberal Science Deniers -




PREV PAGE